Elder Abuse


Notice: Use of undefined constant template_url - assumed 'template_url' in /home1/mkathono/public_html/topcustomessays.com/wp-content/themes/great/functions.php on line 30
 3 page paper with at least 5 sources. Must cite sources used and one source has to be our textbook Brunner & Suddarth’s Textbook of Medical-Surgical Nursing 13th edition Janice L Hinkle & Kerry H Cheever
find the cost of your paper

Apply Ethical framework in practice(Healthcare)


Notice: Use of undefined constant template_url - assumed 'template_url' in /home1/mkathono/public_html/topcustomessays.com/wp-content/themes/great/functions.php on line 30
 Applying Ethical Frameworks in Practice View Rubric

Details:
Using the steps outlined in the decision-making models in your readings, select one ethical decision-making model and use the model to analyze the case provided.
Case Scenario:
A 6-year-old develops a high fever accompanied by violent vomiting and convulsions while at school. The child is rushed to a nearby hospital. The attending physician makes a diagnosis of meningitis and requests permission to initiate treatment from the parents. The child’s parents are divorced. The mother, who is not the biological parent of the child, has primary custody. She is a Christian Scientist who insists that no medical treatment be offered for religious reasons. The biological father, who resides in another state, is also contacted. He insists that treatment be given and seeks independent consultation from another physician.
Assignment:
In a formal, written paper of 800-1,200 words, answer the following questions:
1. What is the ethical dilemma here?
2. Describe the decision-making model you selected from your readings.
3. How would you resolve this dilemma using the model?
4. Include, at the end of your paper, a 200-word dialog in which you explain your decision to the family. (Remember to use language that the family would understand).
A minimum of three references must be used.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the “Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked.
New Attempt
Title Attached Documents Turnitin Report Similarity Index Final Submission
Click ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment or attach documents

Details:

Apply Rubrics
Applying Ethical Frameworks in Practice
1
Unsatisfactory
71.00% 2
Less Than Satisfactory
75.00% 3
Satisfactory
79.00% 4
Good
89.00% 5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
20.0 % Identifies Ethical Dilemma Does not identify an ethical dilemma; or identifies an ethical dilemma but provides no analysis of the ethical implications. Identifies an ethical dilemma. But the description of the ethical dilemma is very vague; or the analysis of the ethical implications of the situation lack significant detail; or, only one side of the ethical dilemma has been analyzed. Significant changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. There is limited discussion of relevant context and exploration of implications. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma in a clear summary, but lacks details to fully represent all sides of the ethical dilemma; or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires more details, rationale, or support. Moderate changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. Relevant context and thorough discussion of issue are provided. Identifies implications and consequences from a practice perspective. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma, some minor details are missing, or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires minor details. Only minor changes are needed. Analysis of issue is comprehensive. Explores issue with broad perspective, identifying underlying relationships between stakeholders and among socially constructed systems. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma with clear details. The analysis of the ethical dilemma has sufficient detail to clearly represent all aspects of ethical dilemma clearly.
40.0 % Identifies Decision-Making Model and Resolution Does not adopt a decision-making model. Does not describe a resolution to the issue. Applies decision-making model incorrectly. Does not explain significance of applying model to the resolution of the issue. Applies decision-making model as a foundation for the identified resolution and provides very basic rationale for its application, given the context of the issue presented. More information is needed on the use of the decision-making model; or more support is needed for the rationale presented for the resolution of the ethical dilemma. Applies decision-making model with clearly distinct understanding of relationships among ideas. Identifies resolution that is appropriate based on the context of the issue, existing relationships and sociocultural factors. Minor changes are needed to improve supporting statements leading to the resolution. Integrates decision-making model in a complex process of judgment and justification with comprehensive discussion of implications for the identified resolution. Clearly articulates significance of model to the resolution with a thorough discussion of strengths and limitations.
20.0 % Includes Family Dialog Dialog is absent. Dialog is included, but language is inappropriate or incorrectly used. Dialog includes appropriate language and describes the resolution based on ethical models. Dialog is an appropriate exchange relating the ethical decision-making model to the context of the issue and its resolution. Dialog is a rich exchange of appropriately phrased information which reinforces the model and resolution, drawing upon issue context and the relationships of stakeholders.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast development of paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 %Format
2.0 % Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
3.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 % Total Weightage

Applying Ethical Frameworks in Practice View Rubric

Details:
Using the steps outlined in the decision-making models in your readings, select one ethical decision-making model and use the model to analyze the case provided.
Case Scenario:
A 6-year-old develops a high fever accompanied by violent vomiting and convulsions while at school. The child is rushed to a nearby hospital. The attending physician makes a diagnosis of meningitis and requests permission to initiate treatment from the parents. The child’s parents are divorced. The mother, who is not the biological parent of the child, has primary custody. She is a Christian Scientist who insists that no medical treatment be offered for religious reasons. The biological father, who resides in another state, is also contacted. He insists that treatment be given and seeks independent consultation from another physician.
Assignment:
In a formal, written paper of 800-1,200 words, answer the following questions:
1. What is the ethical dilemma here?
2. Describe the decision-making model you selected from your readings.
3. How would you resolve this dilemma using the model?
4. Include, at the end of your paper, a 200-word dialog in which you explain your decision to the family. (Remember to use language that the family would understand).
A minimum of three references must be used.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the “Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked.
New Attempt
Title Attached Documents Turnitin Report Similarity Index Final Submission
Click ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment or attach documents

Details:

Apply Rubrics
Applying Ethical Frameworks in Practice
1
Unsatisfactory
71.00% 2
Less Than Satisfactory
75.00% 3
Satisfactory
79.00% 4
Good
89.00% 5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
20.0 % Identifies Ethical Dilemma Does not identify an ethical dilemma; or identifies an ethical dilemma but provides no analysis of the ethical implications. Identifies an ethical dilemma. But the description of the ethical dilemma is very vague; or the analysis of the ethical implications of the situation lack significant detail; or, only one side of the ethical dilemma has been analyzed. Significant changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. There is limited discussion of relevant context and exploration of implications. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma in a clear summary, but lacks details to fully represent all sides of the ethical dilemma; or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires more details, rationale, or support. Moderate changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. Relevant context and thorough discussion of issue are provided. Identifies implications and consequences from a practice perspective. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma, some minor details are missing, or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires minor details. Only minor changes are needed. Analysis of issue is comprehensive. Explores issue with broad perspective, identifying underlying relationships between stakeholders and among socially constructed systems. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma with clear details. The analysis of the ethical dilemma has sufficient detail to clearly represent all aspects of ethical dilemma clearly.
40.0 % Identifies Decision-Making Model and Resolution Does not adopt a decision-making model. Does not describe a resolution to the issue. Applies decision-making model incorrectly. Does not explain significance of applying model to the resolution of the issue. Applies decision-making model as a foundation for the identified resolution and provides very basic rationale for its application, given the context of the issue presented. More information is needed on the use of the decision-making model; or more support is needed for the rationale presented for the resolution of the ethical dilemma. Applies decision-making model with clearly distinct understanding of relationships among ideas. Identifies resolution that is appropriate based on the context of the issue, existing relationships and sociocultural factors. Minor changes are needed to improve supporting statements leading to the resolution. Integrates decision-making model in a complex process of judgment and justification with comprehensive discussion of implications for the identified resolution. Clearly articulates significance of model to the resolution with a thorough discussion of strengths and limitations.
20.0 % Includes Family Dialog Dialog is absent. Dialog is included, but language is inappropriate or incorrectly used. Dialog includes appropriate language and describes the resolution based on ethical models. Dialog is an appropriate exchange relating the ethical decision-making model to the context of the issue and its resolution. Dialog is a rich exchange of appropriately phrased information which reinforces the model and resolution, drawing upon issue context and the relationships of stakeholders.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast development of paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 %Format
2.0 % Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
3.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 % Total Weightage

Applying Ethical Frameworks in Practice View Rubric

Details:
Using the steps outlined in the decision-making models in your readings, select one ethical decision-making model and use the model to analyze the case provided.
Case Scenario:
A 6-year-old develops a high fever accompanied by violent vomiting and convulsions while at school. The child is rushed to a nearby hospital. The attending physician makes a diagnosis of meningitis and requests permission to initiate treatment from the parents. The child’s parents are divorced. The mother, who is not the biological parent of the child, has primary custody. She is a Christian Scientist who insists that no medical treatment be offered for religious reasons. The biological father, who resides in another state, is also contacted. He insists that treatment be given and seeks independent consultation from another physician.
Assignment:
In a formal, written paper of 800-1,200 words, answer the following questions:
1. What is the ethical dilemma here?
2. Describe the decision-making model you selected from your readings.
3. How would you resolve this dilemma using the model?
4. Include, at the end of your paper, a 200-word dialog in which you explain your decision to the family. (Remember to use language that the family would understand).
A minimum of three references must be used.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the “Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked.
New Attempt
Title Attached Documents Turnitin Report Similarity Index Final Submission
Click ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment or attach documents

Details:

Apply Rubrics
Applying Ethical Frameworks in Practice
1
Unsatisfactory
71.00% 2
Less Than Satisfactory
75.00% 3
Satisfactory
79.00% 4
Good
89.00% 5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
20.0 % Identifies Ethical Dilemma Does not identify an ethical dilemma; or identifies an ethical dilemma but provides no analysis of the ethical implications. Identifies an ethical dilemma. But the description of the ethical dilemma is very vague; or the analysis of the ethical implications of the situation lack significant detail; or, only one side of the ethical dilemma has been analyzed. Significant changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. There is limited discussion of relevant context and exploration of implications. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma in a clear summary, but lacks details to fully represent all sides of the ethical dilemma; or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires more details, rationale, or support. Moderate changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. Relevant context and thorough discussion of issue are provided. Identifies implications and consequences from a practice perspective. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma, some minor details are missing, or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires minor details. Only minor changes are needed. Analysis of issue is comprehensive. Explores issue with broad perspective, identifying underlying relationships between stakeholders and among socially constructed systems. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma with clear details. The analysis of the ethical dilemma has sufficient detail to clearly represent all aspects of ethical dilemma clearly.
40.0 % Identifies Decision-Making Model and Resolution Does not adopt a decision-making model. Does not describe a resolution to the issue. Applies decision-making model incorrectly. Does not explain significance of applying model to the resolution of the issue. Applies decision-making model as a foundation for the identified resolution and provides very basic rationale for its application, given the context of the issue presented. More information is needed on the use of the decision-making model; or more support is needed for the rationale presented for the resolution of the ethical dilemma. Applies decision-making model with clearly distinct understanding of relationships among ideas. Identifies resolution that is appropriate based on the context of the issue, existing relationships and sociocultural factors. Minor changes are needed to improve supporting statements leading to the resolution. Integrates decision-making model in a complex process of judgment and justification with comprehensive discussion of implications for the identified resolution. Clearly articulates significance of model to the resolution with a thorough discussion of strengths and limitations.
20.0 % Includes Family Dialog Dialog is absent. Dialog is included, but language is inappropriate or incorrectly used. Dialog includes appropriate language and describes the resolution based on ethical models. Dialog is an appropriate exchange relating the ethical decision-making model to the context of the issue and its resolution. Dialog is a rich exchange of appropriately phrased information which reinforces the model and resolution, drawing upon issue context and the relationships of stakeholders.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast development of paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 %Format
2.0 % Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
3.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 % Total Weightage

Applying Ethical Frameworks in Practice View Rubric

Details:
Using the steps outlined in the decision-making models in your readings, select one ethical decision-making model and use the model to analyze the case provided.
Case Scenario:
A 6-year-old develops a high fever accompanied by violent vomiting and convulsions while at school. The child is rushed to a nearby hospital. The attending physician makes a diagnosis of meningitis and requests permission to initiate treatment from the parents. The child’s parents are divorced. The mother, who is not the biological parent of the child, has primary custody. She is a Christian Scientist who insists that no medical treatment be offered for religious reasons. The biological father, who resides in another state, is also contacted. He insists that treatment be given and seeks independent consultation from another physician.
Assignment:
In a formal, written paper of 800-1,200 words, answer the following questions:
1. What is the ethical dilemma here?
2. Describe the decision-making model you selected from your readings.
3. How would you resolve this dilemma using the model?
4. Include, at the end of your paper, a 200-word dialog in which you explain your decision to the family. (Remember to use language that the family would understand).
A minimum of three references must be used.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the “Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked.
New Attempt
Title Attached Documents Turnitin Report Similarity Index Final Submission
Click ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment or attach documents

Details:

Apply Rubrics
Applying Ethical Frameworks in Practice
1
Unsatisfactory
71.00% 2
Less Than Satisfactory
75.00% 3
Satisfactory
79.00% 4
Good
89.00% 5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
20.0 % Identifies Ethical Dilemma Does not identify an ethical dilemma; or identifies an ethical dilemma but provides no analysis of the ethical implications. Identifies an ethical dilemma. But the description of the ethical dilemma is very vague; or the analysis of the ethical implications of the situation lack significant detail; or, only one side of the ethical dilemma has been analyzed. Significant changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. There is limited discussion of relevant context and exploration of implications. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma in a clear summary, but lacks details to fully represent all sides of the ethical dilemma; or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires more details, rationale, or support. Moderate changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. Relevant context and thorough discussion of issue are provided. Identifies implications and consequences from a practice perspective. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma, some minor details are missing, or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires minor details. Only minor changes are needed. Analysis of issue is comprehensive. Explores issue with broad perspective, identifying underlying relationships between stakeholders and among socially constructed systems. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma with clear details. The analysis of the ethical dilemma has sufficient detail to clearly represent all aspects of ethical dilemma clearly.
40.0 % Identifies Decision-Making Model and Resolution Does not adopt a decision-making model. Does not describe a resolution to the issue. Applies decision-making model incorrectly. Does not explain significance of applying model to the resolution of the issue. Applies decision-making model as a foundation for the identified resolution and provides very basic rationale for its application, given the context of the issue presented. More information is needed on the use of the decision-making model; or more support is needed for the rationale presented for the resolution of the ethical dilemma. Applies decision-making model with clearly distinct understanding of relationships among ideas. Identifies resolution that is appropriate based on the context of the issue, existing relationships and sociocultural factors. Minor changes are needed to improve supporting statements leading to the resolution. Integrates decision-making model in a complex process of judgment and justification with comprehensive discussion of implications for the identified resolution. Clearly articulates significance of model to the resolution with a thorough discussion of strengths and limitations.
20.0 % Includes Family Dialog Dialog is absent. Dialog is included, but language is inappropriate or incorrectly used. Dialog includes appropriate language and describes the resolution based on ethical models. Dialog is an appropriate exchange relating the ethical decision-making model to the context of the issue and its resolution. Dialog is a rich exchange of appropriately phrased information which reinforces the model and resolution, drawing upon issue context and the relationships of stakeholders.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast development of paper. It is descriptive and reflective

find the cost of your paper

System and Operations Management


Notice: Use of undefined constant template_url - assumed 'template_url' in /home1/mkathono/public_html/topcustomessays.com/wp-content/themes/great/functions.php on line 30
 System and Operations Management .
1. Specialism Topic :
Select one from the following three Options and write 600 word summary topic.
Option 1 : Describe the role of information systems in careers in one of the following areas : Accounting/finance, Human resources, marketing and operations management, and explain how careers in information systems have been affected by new technologies and outsourcing.
Option 2 : Explain the role of human resource management in operations : the discussion should look at the strategic importance of managing people in operations settings . you can use chapter 9, entitled people : jobs and organization from slack et al.(2014) Operations management the 7th edition as a starting points.
Option 3 : For an organization of your choice, write a 600 word short case that summarizes how they have strategically harnessed the use of operations and /or information systems. You could consider using Gartner research as a starting point. Gartner are an Anglia Ruskin Partner, You can connect to their site from the https://my.anglia.ac.uk- click on “auto-login to Garter website” from the “links to partner sites” section. You do not have to get your case from there ; any suitable source will be fine.

2. Apply relevant models to analyses the main micro-operations at HAPPY LAND GARDEN CENTER . This could include one or more theoretical modules : The input-process-output model; the value chain model and business process mapping. Evaluate the problems faced by Don Dursley in Managing and developing his centre. (800 words)

3. Complete a mind map/rich picture to identify and explore the potential people; management and technology issues at HAPPYLAND GARDEN CENTRE. Analyse how to improve the operations at happyland Garden centre considering the potential issues (800 words)

4. Academic Rigour
Your Assignment should be written in a Good Business English and be well Structured and presented. Your Assignment should clearly include the academic insight, i.e the concepts and the supporting references involved , indicated in the assignment and listed in the references and bibliography .

find the cost of your paper

Education with technology


Notice: Use of undefined constant template_url - assumed 'template_url' in /home1/mkathono/public_html/topcustomessays.com/wp-content/themes/great/functions.php on line 30
 How 3D printing and cloud data technology is influencing learning in manufacturing. 3D printing and cloud statistics and how it relates to learning theories in production manufacturing, how people are learning and changing the way they learn when using these types of technology. how businesses/manufacturing facilities “learn” from these two pieces of technology with learning processes and theories

The definition of a scholarly journal is: “a journal that requires an article to be subjected to a process of critical evaluation by one or more experts on the subject, known as referees, responsible for determining if the subject of the article falls within the scope of the publication and for evaluating originality, quality of research, clarity of presentation, etc

find the cost of your paper

Abortion/Fertility treatments: Ethics and money


Notice: Use of undefined constant template_url - assumed 'template_url' in /home1/mkathono/public_html/topcustomessays.com/wp-content/themes/great/functions.php on line 30
 Essay title: Abortion/Fertility treatments: Ethics and money
Essay guidance
Show that the ethic of abortion/IVF presupposes a capitalist medicine (e.g., analyse J.J. Thomson’s argument in favor of abortion), and argue why legalization of any of these serves primarily capitalist interests and only secondarily women’s interests (show, for example, that the rights she has in relation to reproduction are only those that are compatible with the capitalist logic).

The focus should be on sociology/history (i.e. explanations), not philosophy (i.e. justifications). In any event, support your claims with as much literature as possible.

Abstract : The abstract should contain a sentence or two about the matter, how you intend to tackle it, and your most general conclusions.
Introduction explaining the matter, describing what you intend to do, how, and why.
Text divided to chapters as necessary — e.g. background; argument, discussion, etc.
Conclusions: provide a summary of the essay with your conclusions.
References. Please use Chicago or Vancouver style, and do so consistently. at least 30 references should be included.

find the cost of your paper

the effect of overpopulation on environmental degradation in developing countries especially in china


Notice: Use of undefined constant template_url - assumed 'template_url' in /home1/mkathono/public_html/topcustomessays.com/wp-content/themes/great/functions.php on line 30
 the proposal should be organized as follows:

Introduction: the importance of the topic and its relevance to economics. It should also include what are you going to investigate? why is it important who will benefit from your findings and how will they benefit from your findings?

THE INTRODUCTION SECTION SHOULD BE AROUND ONE PAGE.

Section 2 is the aim and the specific objectives: A clear aim of the overall aim and specific objectives of the research to be undertaken. These can be formulated as testable hypotheses or as research questions. THIS SECTION SHOULD BE AROUND A HALF PAGE.

SECTION 3 is a brief literature review of no more than 2 pages. Around 10 sources should be cited

SECTION 4 is the research methods: A clear description of the research methods to be used. Include justification for choice of research methods and how the methods will be use. THIS SECTION SHOULD BE AROUND ONE PAGE.

SECTION 5 IS DOING THE RESEARCH: A clear plan of how the research will be undertaken. what information gathering technique will you use? what type of information will you need to gather and what type of questions will you need to ask? how will the information be gathered in practice who will provide you with the information? when and where will the information be gathered in practice? what analysis techniques will you use? THIS SECTION SHOULD BE AROUND 2 PAGES

find the cost of your paper

International business case analysis


Notice: Use of undefined constant template_url - assumed 'template_url' in /home1/mkathono/public_html/topcustomessays.com/wp-content/themes/great/functions.php on line 30
 please read the attached case and answer this question :

If the New York City store is not hugely profitable (or if Caffebene does not become a multi-hundred store operation in the U.S. in a few years) would you call Caffebene’s U.S. entry a failure? Would you say that Caffebene’s way of doing business has failed when it comes to its global strategy? Why or why not?

you need to write 240 words max for the question and use two references other than the case with citation

and its better to use appendix to support your answer

find the cost of your paper

American Enlightenment


Notice: Use of undefined constant template_url - assumed 'template_url' in /home1/mkathono/public_html/topcustomessays.com/wp-content/themes/great/functions.php on line 30
 Benjamin Franklins “Autobiography”
J. HECTOR ST. JOHN DE CRÈVECOEUR “Letters From An American Farmer”
Olaudah Equiano “Interesting Narrative”

These works are from the textbook : Baym, Nina, et al., eds. The Norton Anthology of American Literature, 8th ed. Vols. A, and B. New York: Norton, 2011. ISBN # 9780393913095

Using the literature works listed above write a detailed analysis that responds to this prompt:

How do these writers define their vision of America and what Enlightenment ideals influence their thinking? It is important to make connections among the writings, rather than discuss them separately. Your essay should be 5-7 pages double-spaced and in proper MLA format.

find the cost of your paper

Environmental Issue


Notice: Use of undefined constant template_url - assumed 'template_url' in /home1/mkathono/public_html/topcustomessays.com/wp-content/themes/great/functions.php on line 30
 Select a documentary that is in some way connected to an environmental issue. Must be at least 45 minutes. Write a paragraph or two summarizing this issue and critiquing the video. Write a paragraph describing how this documentary impacted you personally. Why do you think this is important issue and what can we do to help the situation.
find the cost of your paper