Apply Ethical framework in practice(Healthcare)

 Applying Ethical Frameworks in Practice View Rubric

Details:
Using the steps outlined in the decision-making models in your readings, select one ethical decision-making model and use the model to analyze the case provided.
Case Scenario:
A 6-year-old develops a high fever accompanied by violent vomiting and convulsions while at school. The child is rushed to a nearby hospital. The attending physician makes a diagnosis of meningitis and requests permission to initiate treatment from the parents. The child’s parents are divorced. The mother, who is not the biological parent of the child, has primary custody. She is a Christian Scientist who insists that no medical treatment be offered for religious reasons. The biological father, who resides in another state, is also contacted. He insists that treatment be given and seeks independent consultation from another physician.
Assignment:
In a formal, written paper of 800-1,200 words, answer the following questions:
1. What is the ethical dilemma here?
2. Describe the decision-making model you selected from your readings.
3. How would you resolve this dilemma using the model?
4. Include, at the end of your paper, a 200-word dialog in which you explain your decision to the family. (Remember to use language that the family would understand).
A minimum of three references must be used.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the “Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked.
New Attempt
Title Attached Documents Turnitin Report Similarity Index Final Submission
Click ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment or attach documents

Details:

Apply Rubrics
Applying Ethical Frameworks in Practice
1
Unsatisfactory
71.00% 2
Less Than Satisfactory
75.00% 3
Satisfactory
79.00% 4
Good
89.00% 5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
20.0 % Identifies Ethical Dilemma Does not identify an ethical dilemma; or identifies an ethical dilemma but provides no analysis of the ethical implications. Identifies an ethical dilemma. But the description of the ethical dilemma is very vague; or the analysis of the ethical implications of the situation lack significant detail; or, only one side of the ethical dilemma has been analyzed. Significant changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. There is limited discussion of relevant context and exploration of implications. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma in a clear summary, but lacks details to fully represent all sides of the ethical dilemma; or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires more details, rationale, or support. Moderate changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. Relevant context and thorough discussion of issue are provided. Identifies implications and consequences from a practice perspective. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma, some minor details are missing, or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires minor details. Only minor changes are needed. Analysis of issue is comprehensive. Explores issue with broad perspective, identifying underlying relationships between stakeholders and among socially constructed systems. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma with clear details. The analysis of the ethical dilemma has sufficient detail to clearly represent all aspects of ethical dilemma clearly.
40.0 % Identifies Decision-Making Model and Resolution Does not adopt a decision-making model. Does not describe a resolution to the issue. Applies decision-making model incorrectly. Does not explain significance of applying model to the resolution of the issue. Applies decision-making model as a foundation for the identified resolution and provides very basic rationale for its application, given the context of the issue presented. More information is needed on the use of the decision-making model; or more support is needed for the rationale presented for the resolution of the ethical dilemma. Applies decision-making model with clearly distinct understanding of relationships among ideas. Identifies resolution that is appropriate based on the context of the issue, existing relationships and sociocultural factors. Minor changes are needed to improve supporting statements leading to the resolution. Integrates decision-making model in a complex process of judgment and justification with comprehensive discussion of implications for the identified resolution. Clearly articulates significance of model to the resolution with a thorough discussion of strengths and limitations.
20.0 % Includes Family Dialog Dialog is absent. Dialog is included, but language is inappropriate or incorrectly used. Dialog includes appropriate language and describes the resolution based on ethical models. Dialog is an appropriate exchange relating the ethical decision-making model to the context of the issue and its resolution. Dialog is a rich exchange of appropriately phrased information which reinforces the model and resolution, drawing upon issue context and the relationships of stakeholders.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast development of paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 %Format
2.0 % Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
3.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 % Total Weightage

Applying Ethical Frameworks in Practice View Rubric

Details:
Using the steps outlined in the decision-making models in your readings, select one ethical decision-making model and use the model to analyze the case provided.
Case Scenario:
A 6-year-old develops a high fever accompanied by violent vomiting and convulsions while at school. The child is rushed to a nearby hospital. The attending physician makes a diagnosis of meningitis and requests permission to initiate treatment from the parents. The child’s parents are divorced. The mother, who is not the biological parent of the child, has primary custody. She is a Christian Scientist who insists that no medical treatment be offered for religious reasons. The biological father, who resides in another state, is also contacted. He insists that treatment be given and seeks independent consultation from another physician.
Assignment:
In a formal, written paper of 800-1,200 words, answer the following questions:
1. What is the ethical dilemma here?
2. Describe the decision-making model you selected from your readings.
3. How would you resolve this dilemma using the model?
4. Include, at the end of your paper, a 200-word dialog in which you explain your decision to the family. (Remember to use language that the family would understand).
A minimum of three references must be used.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the “Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked.
New Attempt
Title Attached Documents Turnitin Report Similarity Index Final Submission
Click ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment or attach documents

Details:

Apply Rubrics
Applying Ethical Frameworks in Practice
1
Unsatisfactory
71.00% 2
Less Than Satisfactory
75.00% 3
Satisfactory
79.00% 4
Good
89.00% 5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
20.0 % Identifies Ethical Dilemma Does not identify an ethical dilemma; or identifies an ethical dilemma but provides no analysis of the ethical implications. Identifies an ethical dilemma. But the description of the ethical dilemma is very vague; or the analysis of the ethical implications of the situation lack significant detail; or, only one side of the ethical dilemma has been analyzed. Significant changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. There is limited discussion of relevant context and exploration of implications. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma in a clear summary, but lacks details to fully represent all sides of the ethical dilemma; or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires more details, rationale, or support. Moderate changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. Relevant context and thorough discussion of issue are provided. Identifies implications and consequences from a practice perspective. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma, some minor details are missing, or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires minor details. Only minor changes are needed. Analysis of issue is comprehensive. Explores issue with broad perspective, identifying underlying relationships between stakeholders and among socially constructed systems. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma with clear details. The analysis of the ethical dilemma has sufficient detail to clearly represent all aspects of ethical dilemma clearly.
40.0 % Identifies Decision-Making Model and Resolution Does not adopt a decision-making model. Does not describe a resolution to the issue. Applies decision-making model incorrectly. Does not explain significance of applying model to the resolution of the issue. Applies decision-making model as a foundation for the identified resolution and provides very basic rationale for its application, given the context of the issue presented. More information is needed on the use of the decision-making model; or more support is needed for the rationale presented for the resolution of the ethical dilemma. Applies decision-making model with clearly distinct understanding of relationships among ideas. Identifies resolution that is appropriate based on the context of the issue, existing relationships and sociocultural factors. Minor changes are needed to improve supporting statements leading to the resolution. Integrates decision-making model in a complex process of judgment and justification with comprehensive discussion of implications for the identified resolution. Clearly articulates significance of model to the resolution with a thorough discussion of strengths and limitations.
20.0 % Includes Family Dialog Dialog is absent. Dialog is included, but language is inappropriate or incorrectly used. Dialog includes appropriate language and describes the resolution based on ethical models. Dialog is an appropriate exchange relating the ethical decision-making model to the context of the issue and its resolution. Dialog is a rich exchange of appropriately phrased information which reinforces the model and resolution, drawing upon issue context and the relationships of stakeholders.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast development of paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 %Format
2.0 % Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
3.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 % Total Weightage

Applying Ethical Frameworks in Practice View Rubric

Details:
Using the steps outlined in the decision-making models in your readings, select one ethical decision-making model and use the model to analyze the case provided.
Case Scenario:
A 6-year-old develops a high fever accompanied by violent vomiting and convulsions while at school. The child is rushed to a nearby hospital. The attending physician makes a diagnosis of meningitis and requests permission to initiate treatment from the parents. The child’s parents are divorced. The mother, who is not the biological parent of the child, has primary custody. She is a Christian Scientist who insists that no medical treatment be offered for religious reasons. The biological father, who resides in another state, is also contacted. He insists that treatment be given and seeks independent consultation from another physician.
Assignment:
In a formal, written paper of 800-1,200 words, answer the following questions:
1. What is the ethical dilemma here?
2. Describe the decision-making model you selected from your readings.
3. How would you resolve this dilemma using the model?
4. Include, at the end of your paper, a 200-word dialog in which you explain your decision to the family. (Remember to use language that the family would understand).
A minimum of three references must be used.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the “Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked.
New Attempt
Title Attached Documents Turnitin Report Similarity Index Final Submission
Click ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment or attach documents

Details:

Apply Rubrics
Applying Ethical Frameworks in Practice
1
Unsatisfactory
71.00% 2
Less Than Satisfactory
75.00% 3
Satisfactory
79.00% 4
Good
89.00% 5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
20.0 % Identifies Ethical Dilemma Does not identify an ethical dilemma; or identifies an ethical dilemma but provides no analysis of the ethical implications. Identifies an ethical dilemma. But the description of the ethical dilemma is very vague; or the analysis of the ethical implications of the situation lack significant detail; or, only one side of the ethical dilemma has been analyzed. Significant changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. There is limited discussion of relevant context and exploration of implications. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma in a clear summary, but lacks details to fully represent all sides of the ethical dilemma; or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires more details, rationale, or support. Moderate changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. Relevant context and thorough discussion of issue are provided. Identifies implications and consequences from a practice perspective. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma, some minor details are missing, or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires minor details. Only minor changes are needed. Analysis of issue is comprehensive. Explores issue with broad perspective, identifying underlying relationships between stakeholders and among socially constructed systems. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma with clear details. The analysis of the ethical dilemma has sufficient detail to clearly represent all aspects of ethical dilemma clearly.
40.0 % Identifies Decision-Making Model and Resolution Does not adopt a decision-making model. Does not describe a resolution to the issue. Applies decision-making model incorrectly. Does not explain significance of applying model to the resolution of the issue. Applies decision-making model as a foundation for the identified resolution and provides very basic rationale for its application, given the context of the issue presented. More information is needed on the use of the decision-making model; or more support is needed for the rationale presented for the resolution of the ethical dilemma. Applies decision-making model with clearly distinct understanding of relationships among ideas. Identifies resolution that is appropriate based on the context of the issue, existing relationships and sociocultural factors. Minor changes are needed to improve supporting statements leading to the resolution. Integrates decision-making model in a complex process of judgment and justification with comprehensive discussion of implications for the identified resolution. Clearly articulates significance of model to the resolution with a thorough discussion of strengths and limitations.
20.0 % Includes Family Dialog Dialog is absent. Dialog is included, but language is inappropriate or incorrectly used. Dialog includes appropriate language and describes the resolution based on ethical models. Dialog is an appropriate exchange relating the ethical decision-making model to the context of the issue and its resolution. Dialog is a rich exchange of appropriately phrased information which reinforces the model and resolution, drawing upon issue context and the relationships of stakeholders.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast development of paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 %Format
2.0 % Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
3.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 % Total Weightage

Applying Ethical Frameworks in Practice View Rubric

Details:
Using the steps outlined in the decision-making models in your readings, select one ethical decision-making model and use the model to analyze the case provided.
Case Scenario:
A 6-year-old develops a high fever accompanied by violent vomiting and convulsions while at school. The child is rushed to a nearby hospital. The attending physician makes a diagnosis of meningitis and requests permission to initiate treatment from the parents. The child’s parents are divorced. The mother, who is not the biological parent of the child, has primary custody. She is a Christian Scientist who insists that no medical treatment be offered for religious reasons. The biological father, who resides in another state, is also contacted. He insists that treatment be given and seeks independent consultation from another physician.
Assignment:
In a formal, written paper of 800-1,200 words, answer the following questions:
1. What is the ethical dilemma here?
2. Describe the decision-making model you selected from your readings.
3. How would you resolve this dilemma using the model?
4. Include, at the end of your paper, a 200-word dialog in which you explain your decision to the family. (Remember to use language that the family would understand).
A minimum of three references must be used.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the “Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked.
New Attempt
Title Attached Documents Turnitin Report Similarity Index Final Submission
Click ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment or attach documents

Details:

Apply Rubrics
Applying Ethical Frameworks in Practice
1
Unsatisfactory
71.00% 2
Less Than Satisfactory
75.00% 3
Satisfactory
79.00% 4
Good
89.00% 5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
20.0 % Identifies Ethical Dilemma Does not identify an ethical dilemma; or identifies an ethical dilemma but provides no analysis of the ethical implications. Identifies an ethical dilemma. But the description of the ethical dilemma is very vague; or the analysis of the ethical implications of the situation lack significant detail; or, only one side of the ethical dilemma has been analyzed. Significant changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. There is limited discussion of relevant context and exploration of implications. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma in a clear summary, but lacks details to fully represent all sides of the ethical dilemma; or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires more details, rationale, or support. Moderate changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. Relevant context and thorough discussion of issue are provided. Identifies implications and consequences from a practice perspective. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma, some minor details are missing, or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires minor details. Only minor changes are needed. Analysis of issue is comprehensive. Explores issue with broad perspective, identifying underlying relationships between stakeholders and among socially constructed systems. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma with clear details. The analysis of the ethical dilemma has sufficient detail to clearly represent all aspects of ethical dilemma clearly.
40.0 % Identifies Decision-Making Model and Resolution Does not adopt a decision-making model. Does not describe a resolution to the issue. Applies decision-making model incorrectly. Does not explain significance of applying model to the resolution of the issue. Applies decision-making model as a foundation for the identified resolution and provides very basic rationale for its application, given the context of the issue presented. More information is needed on the use of the decision-making model; or more support is needed for the rationale presented for the resolution of the ethical dilemma. Applies decision-making model with clearly distinct understanding of relationships among ideas. Identifies resolution that is appropriate based on the context of the issue, existing relationships and sociocultural factors. Minor changes are needed to improve supporting statements leading to the resolution. Integrates decision-making model in a complex process of judgment and justification with comprehensive discussion of implications for the identified resolution. Clearly articulates significance of model to the resolution with a thorough discussion of strengths and limitations.
20.0 % Includes Family Dialog Dialog is absent. Dialog is included, but language is inappropriate or incorrectly used. Dialog includes appropriate language and describes the resolution based on ethical models. Dialog is an appropriate exchange relating the ethical decision-making model to the context of the issue and its resolution. Dialog is a rich exchange of appropriately phrased information which reinforces the model and resolution, drawing upon issue context and the relationships of stakeholders.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast development of paper. It is descriptive and reflective